Free Web Hosting by Netfirms
Web Hosting by Netfirms | Free Domain Names by Netfirms

         Common Sense Law

                        Home         Mission          

Federal Law on Substances (including Marijuana)     Attorney Allison Margolin's Motion on Jurisdiction     Motions for Pro Se Defendants   Due Process    Court Filings      California Drug Law        Immigration    Federal Gun Law

  Reward re. Substances   Reward re. Marijuana    Urgent Action       Events       Download Articles

 

Menu

Home

Mission

Contact us

********

Download Articles

Reward re. Marijuana  

    Reward re. Substances 

Urgent Action   

Events

 Federal Law on Substances (including  Marijuana) 

California Drug Law 

  Attorney Allison Margolin's Motion on  Jurisdiction 

Motions Pro Se Defendants

Court Filings

 Due Process

Federal Gun Law

Immigration  

Menu

SAMPLE OF MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION FOR U.S. DISTRICT COURT

NOTE: See Instructions following the Motion.

 

Click here for Motion and Instructions for easy emailing as pdf

 

 

Text Box: SAMPLE MOTION  FOR FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT
At greyed Italics:  Put in your own information for your motion on template provided, whether the Argument is simple or with an added argument concerning a previous plea agreement.

 

 

 

Joe Prisoner, #111222

Name County or Federal jail

111 Main St.

Jailtown, CA 99999

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                        Plaintiff,

            vs.

Joe Prisoner

                        Defendant

)

)

)

)

)

 

Case No. CR-06-9999 ABC

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Notice of Hearing

Date: January 15, 2007

Time:   1:00 pm

 

 

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Defendant   Joe Prisoner_______________________  hereby moves this Court to dismiss charges for lack of jurisdiction.

 

THE PRECEDENT UPON WHICH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT’S ABILITY TO GOVERN INTERSTATE COMMERCE, WICKARD V. FILBURN, 317 U.S. 111, IS PREMISED UPON THE FACT THAT THE PLAINTIFF IN THAT CASE REGISTERED IN A FEDERAL PROGRAM; BECAUSE DEFENDANT NEVER TOOK ADVANTAGE AS A REGISTRANT OR RECIPIENT OF BENEFITS OF A FEDERAL PROGRAM, THE WICKARD BASIS OF JURISDICTION IS INAPPLICABLE HERE.

 

Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), is considered to be the controlling precedent upon which Congress has relied to expand the definition of interstate commerce. The common notion is that nearly any aspect of commerce can be regulated if a piece of wheat could be governed by the federal government. In fact, in that case, the federal government had developed a subsidy system to help farmers in a particular field, that of wheat farming. One farmer, the plaintiff in the Wickard, 317 U.S. 111, filed a complaint asking to enjoin enforcement of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938. The Act set up quotas for farmers and imposed penalties for farmers who while taking advantage of the federal subsidies dolled out by the agency, wanted to be immunized from the penalties associated from not following the conditions required to take advantage of these benefits.

Defendant never registered nor received benefits from any federal agency regulating controlled substances.  Therefore, the federal government lacks the jurisdictional basis asserted in Wickard, 317 U.S. 111. As the Wickard court wrote, acknowledging the role the plaintiff had in bringing about federal jurisdiction over his activity:

 

We can hardly find a denial of due process in these circumstances, particularly since it is even doubtful that appellee’s burdens under the program outweigh his benefits. It is hardly lack of due process for the Government to regulate that which it subsidizes.  317 U.S. 111 at p. 130. 

 

The Supreme Court clearly states that unregulated “others” exist outside the jurisdiction of the administrative agency.

It is of the essence of regulation that it lays a restraining hand on the self-interest of the regulated and that advantages from the regulation commonly fall to others.  Ibid. at p. 129

               

      Defendant is one of the “others”, as defendant has never registered for benefit or received benefit from any federal agency regulating controlled substances.

 

     THEREFORE, defendant asks the court to dismiss all charges against defendant and return all property seized or attached in this case.

 

Respectfully submitted,

 

__ Joe Prisoner ___________,     ____November 7, 2006

Joe Prisoner                                                    Date

 

Instructions for Prisoners filing the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction

in the Federal District Court

 

We are freely offering this information on jurisdiction gleaned from our research.  We are not attorneys and are not offering this as legal advice or legal counsel. The Motion is based on the motion filed by Attorney, Allison Margolin.  First, ask your attorney to file the motion.  You may have to do it yourself as pro se, if your attorney refuses to do it.  If you have signed a plea agreement, use the 3-page motion, which has the first argument dealing with the plea, followed by the simple motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.  If no plea agreement has been signed, use the simpler 2-page motion that only addresses the Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.  If you are currently serving your sentence in prison or on probation, you must take into consideration the rules for filing a 2255 or 2241 motion.  (see 28 U.S.C. 2241, 2255)

 

You fill in the Motion brief with type or pen (see condensed sample motion filled in with italics)

-  replace the italics with your own information (there are about 10 entries)

- Don’t forget to enter your case number followed by initials of your judge

- Notice it for hearing on page 1 with date and time.  Your judge’s Motion and

      Hearing day, is the day and time you have generally gone for hearing. 

      Add at least 2 weeks (14 days) to this weeks Motion and Hearing Day.

 

Send Clerk:  Most important to at least  send the Clerk one original motion if you cannot make copies.

- if you can make copies:

- 1 Original and 1 copy of completed and signed Motions

- Clerk cover note / Dear Clerk, please return file-stamped copy to me in SASE.

       (Include folded self-addressed stamped envelope – 1 first class stamp will do.)

- Proof of Service original (if you have copy of motion available to send to AUSA)

You fill in Proof of Service template or make your own: (see sample below filled in with italics)

-  replace the italics with your own information (there are about 8 entries)

 

If you have enough copies of motions:

Send the Assistant US Attorney (AUSA) prosecuting your case:

- Copy of filled-in and signed Motion

 

Keep for yourself:

- 1 filled out Motion copy for your record. 

-          Proof of Service copy for your record.  (if you have enough copies of motions)

Text Box: SAMPLE PROOF OF SERVICE
At Italics:  Put in your own information for your motion
Note:  Server can be Defendant and is considered so in this Sample
If necessary, make your own in printed writing, copied after this sample.

 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE

 

I, __Joe Prisoner ________________________________________, hereby certify that I

properly placed ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Joe Prisoner’s_______________________ 

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION,

in an envelope, sealed the envelope and mailed it with First Class postage

at ___Name of County or Federal Jail _______________________________,

in __Jailtown, California 99999 __________

on _November 7, 2006_____.

The letter was addressed as follows:

_Your Prosecuting Attorney’s Name_____________, Assistant U. S. Attorney

A.U.S.A. Office Address _600 Main Street___

Metropolis, California 99999________________________

 

Server’s Address:

Joe Prisoner, #111222

Some County or Federal jail

111 Main St.

Jailtown, CA 99999

 

_ Joe Prisoner ____________________                               November 7, 2006__

SIGNATURE                                                                                          DATE

 

Click here for Motion and Instructions for easy emailing as pdf

 

We want to hear from you, contact us (for mailed response include SASE)      

Common Sense Law
P.O. Box 6528
          Santa Rosa, CA 95406

email:   commonsenselaw    @     yahoo.com

 

Check out www.commonsenselaw.com for updates on this issue.

  Your comments and insights are welcome.  Our slogan is:  True and Correct Law.  If you spot an error, contact us, and it will be corrected.

Hit Counter

 

                   

  Home         Mission   

Federal Law on Substances (including Marijuana)     Attorney Allison Margolin's Motion on Jurisdiction     Motions for Pro Se Defendants   Due Process    Court Filings      California Drug Law       Immigration     Federal Gun Law

  Reward re. Substances   Reward re. Marijuana    Urgent Action       Events   Download Articles

All information on the site is provided for educational purposes only.    Common Sense Law does not provide legal advice.  The authors are not attorneys and not officers of a court of law.   If you are seeking legal counsel, contact an attorney and/or do your own due diligent research.

Send e mail to:   commonsenselaw  @  yahoo.com        (remove spaces before copying to email program)
with questions or comments about this web site.  For mail response send SASE WITH ENOUGH POSTAGE TO COVER 1 OUNCE for letter, 3 OUNCES for Motion or other Articles.  
Copyright © 2005-2007 Common Sense Law     All Rights Reserved
Last modified: May 28, 2008